Talk:Malheur National Wildlife Refuge

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Oregon Mid‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Importance

My guess is that this is about to a highly visited article following the takeover and more news on the incident. Should we thus consider bringing up the editing limits. OttselSpy25 (talk) 05:13, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We don't protect pages preemptively and no edits so far call for anything to be applied. --Michael Greiner 05:49, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The takeover kerfluffle will probably get a few paragraphs off in their own section once this is all over, but for now I think the small note up at the top that we have is appropriate. If the situation gets huge there might be a "Malhuer Standoff" page later but I'm sure we all hope it remains a stupid footnote in local history. Wyvern (talk) 06:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already is a "standoff" page: Militia occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge Leitmotiv (talk) 22:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV is our goal. I see that your userpage seems to be at odds with that. Leitmotiv (talk) 03:02, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Throw a tantrum if you want, but you're the one with verbal attacks on Wikipedia as a whole. If you aren't here for constructive criticism or you're simply trolling, you'll find yourself banned before too long. Leitmotiv (talk) 19:23, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You wish. Anything else important you have to say? I'm out. Leitmotiv (talk) 20:34, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just stop now everyone. It's in the edit history for people to read, I'll deal with the editor. Doug Weller talk 12:18, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bundy militia's demand(s)

Regarding our article about the Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge please consider commenting at that article's talk page on the question "Should we say anything more about Public Lands Privatization and demand feds cede ownership?"NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 10:22, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160128132002/http://burnstimesherald.info/2012/01/18/malheur-wildlife-refuge-drafts-ccp-with-the-help-of-diverse-stakeholders/ to http://burnstimesherald.info/2012/01/18/malheur-wildlife-refuge-drafts-ccp-with-the-help-of-diverse-stakeholders/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:12, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]