Jump to content

Talk:Man in Space Soonest

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hoax?

[edit]

Who would give a project deliberately the acronym MISS? Why not "First American In Low Orbit 'Round Earth" a.k.a. FAILORE? -- Matthead discuß!     O       08:13, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's no hoax. The program is verifiable by the two external references which have since been added. JustinTime55 (talk) 19:43, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MISS Program Appointees

[edit]

Further research on the Spacefacts and Astronautix websites confirm that William B.Bridgeman was on the 1957 list for MISS astronaut sellectees. He was a Navy pilot in WW II and worked foe Douglass Aircraft in the 50's as a test pilot. He at one time held the altitude and speed records in 1951 and appeared on the cover of Life magizine as the "Fastest Man Alive." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.172.121.54 (talk) 19:51, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bridgeman no longer appears on the list; someone (TopGUN71691) replaced him with Forrest S. Petersen (mis-spelled as Peterson!) Petersen was an X-15 pilot, but was US Navy, and thus not a likely candidate for a USAF program. He also doesn't appear in either of the two external references. JustinTime55 (talk) 19:58, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I'm lovin' that picture of Alvin S. White. Seriously, if you don't have pictures of everyone, don't make it an image gallery! How about a table? Then you could have pictures of some people, but not all. I don't know enough about markup to do this, but if someone else could, it would be great. ☻☻☻Sithman VIII !!☻☻☻ 22:56, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Serious quality issues

[edit]

This article stinks to high heaven, but I'm going to hold my nose and dig in. Issues:

  • This is really nothing more than a list of the candidates; there is practically no information on the program itself.
  • A sad attempt to make up for the above is made by padding it with a picture gallery and biographical information. This should all be unnecessary here, as it is (should be) all available in the individual pilots' articles.
  • No citations (to be fair, there's probably not much out there beyond the two external references, but these should be in citation form.)
  • A circular citation reference to a wikilink (Wikipedia can't cite itself!)
  • An apparent factual error: William Bridgeman is missing, and Forrest S. Petersen (also mis-spelled as "Peterson") appears in his place (see above).
  • I can't see any RW verification that there were two separate selections in 1957 and 1958; Astronautix cites a single "June 25, 1958 US Air Force briefing" including all 9 names. I also don't see a reference to 1957 in the "First Up?" article.

This article should look more like NASA Astronaut Group 2, which is a good model. Rolling up my sleeves... JustinTime55 (talk) 20:18, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Man in Space Soonest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:37, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Titan?

[edit]

The article says that Thor and Atlas rockets were considered. HGM-25A Titan I says that Titan I was also considered. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 21:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]