Talk:Manotick

Canada: Ontario / Communities Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.

Ottawa Mid‑importance

	Ontario portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ottawa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ottawa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OttawaWikipedia:WikiProject OttawaTemplate:WikiProject OttawaOttawa articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools

St. Mark Catholic High School is not listed under the schools in Manotick. Even though it is not in the village, it has a Manotick address and should probably be listed here. I will add it, and if there is any objection, please feel free to explain why it should not be there. Ltig3 21:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mahogany subdivision dispute

This section needs to be updated. Now that the OMB has approved the subdivision, the section should focus mostly on what WILL be built, not what is "expected" or "proposed". I propose one paragraph for the future developments, one paragraph for the history of the dispute (major rulings, votes, town halls, etc), and one paragraph for criticism and support. Though there will undoubtedly be more criticism than support, there are both. Since the criticism/support section is obviously the one most susceptible to POV, it especially needs to be referenced.

In a perfect world, I'd say this section shouldn't exist, based on the fact that it is notable mostly as a current event. If we get a decent section going, maybe it can just be cut down to a paragraph and stuck somewhere else. -M.Nelson (talk) 02:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Manotick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:50, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]