Talk:Maxilla

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anatomy: Gross High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

Animal anatomy Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Animal anatomy, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to animal anatomy apart from human anatomy. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Animal anatomy. This project is an offshoot of WikiProject AnimalsAnimal anatomyWikipedia:WikiProject Animal anatomyTemplate:WikiProject Animal anatomyAnimal anatomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

lead

The lead sentence is missing words. Piratejosh85 (talk) 16:37, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Ossification of maxilla

I have proposed this merge, between the 'ossification' page and this article, because:

There is no need for the information on ossification to be hidden away on a separate article. This means the information is not presented as it could be, and it is needlessly fragmented.
It is standard on Anatomy pages, and recommended in WP:MEDMOS#Anatomy, for 'Development' sections to be displayed on the same page.
Additionally, this page is small and it would give more context to have the information displayed in a central location, rather than hidden on a separate article.
If necessary, the article on ossification could be expanded at a later date.
As can be seen, by having two separate articles content is already duplicated and/or displayed on one or either article, rather than displayed in a central place on just one article LT910001 (talk) 07:17, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have completed this merge. --LT910001 (talk) 03:33, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Body of maxilla

Readily merged into parent article, prevents needless fragmentation and centralises information for readers Tom (LT) (talk) 17:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I support this merge. ″Body of maxilla″ might be the more traditional textbook medical term, but most medical professionals and academics seem to use the single word ″maxilla″ to refer to this bone. This term still allows for the use of ″maxillary sinus″ to distinguish the cavities from the bone. Ashleyisachild (talk) 23:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Images

This C-class article has nineteen images with thirteen listed under the "Additional images" section. Six to eight of them can easily be removed as unnecessary and close duplication. Otr500 (talk) 02:41, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removed twelve images that are either redundant or offer nothing that cannot be seen from remaining images. The animated image does not offer anything special either.Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files, nor a "manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal". Otr500 (talk) 13:46, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]