This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
I came across this article patrolling the backlog for the NP. It's good to see such a well written piece in the list- the amount of spam and one sentence articles I come across! You have the makings of a fine article here, after a skim read, the one thing I'd say is that it's lacking WP:RS. There are some, but, ideally, there'd be a citation for more or less every fact in there to ensure that information is factually correct and can be verified easily. Also, the article may be within the scope of a wikiproject. If a relevant one can be found, its members may be able to give some more pointers and it might get the article some more traffic. Keep up the good work. HJ Mitchell (talk) 09:50, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
