Talk:Michael Angarano

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

hey in michaels filmography it leaves out a couple of films that he did actually star in one being The Brainiacs.com (2000) where he played a leading role

if you go to imdb and type in his name you will see the film/films

That's why it's labeled a selected filmography, not an exhaustive one. -BlackTerror 06:48, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious of his religious background? Anyone got any info on that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.25.56.221 (talk) 09:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Third Opinion needed

I'll take it to WP:3O if we don't get a response here. There is a debate going for this article over whether Angarano's relationship with Kristen Stewart is worth mentioning, and if a Vanity Fair interview is a credible source for this information. Any opinions would be appreciated. Thank you. Andrea (talk) 13:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it. The magazine quotes Stewart herself; that seems pretty credible. Cadwaladr (talk) 15:55, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I say it should be removed. The quote is vague and the term "boyfriend" is very ambigious. Michael Angarano himself hasn't confirmed they are going out either. Dating situations can change at any moment. If they are engaged or married then that is different and more stable. I'll remove the citiation in 24 hours. Fighting for Justice (talk) 19:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uhh thus far the consensus is that it should remain. I fail to see how "My boyfriend, Michael Angarano!" is either vague or ambiguous. I can find more sources, if you'd like. They have been dating for years, and it is thus stable enough that it should be included. Andrea (talk) 20:04, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see the information as fancruft and encyclopedias should not contain unimportant facts. The quote is vague because it doesn't say "I'm dating Michael Angarano; and "boyfriend" could mean a boy who is a friend. A boy she has interest in. Moreover, there is no confirmation from Michael Angarano's side. Besides, are our lives so boring we have to be priivy to a celeberty's love life? Who cares if they're going out. Dating situations change. All this information does is generate gossip and a waste of space. Fighting for Justice (talk) 21:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added a ref that specifically uses the word "date". Is that better? Really, this is getting ridiculous. You don't have to care if they are going out any more than you have to care what town Angarano grew up in. You, personally, not caring about something is no reason to remove information. How boring people's lives are has absolutely nothing to do with this. Andrea (talk) 00:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All right. That makes things a lot better. Fighting for Justice (talk) 01:54, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Angarano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140911183934/http://reflectionsindance.info/www.reflectionsindance.info/Reflections_In_Dance.html to http://reflectionsindance.info/main/staff

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:41, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]