Talk:Michael Carabello

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past with the comment:
This article was deleted through the proposed deletion process. That deletion has been contested, and the article has been restored. Further attempts at deleting this article should be made through articles for deletion or the criteria for speedy deletion if the article meets any speedy deletion criteria except the recreation of deleted material criterion.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Percussion Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Percussion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Percussion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PercussionWikipedia:WikiProject PercussionTemplate:WikiProject PercussionPercussion
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Propose Deletion

Notify author/project: == Proposed deletion of Mike Carabello ==

The article Mike Carabello has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article reads like a summary page from a press kit used to promote artists/musicians. Or possibly a review from a newspaper. It certainly isn't suitably written for an encyclopedia. I think the guy is possibly notable enough, but this is very soapbox-like and promotional sounding. Additionally there is no real confirmable reference or citation other than the name of a newspaper. And even then, no specific article in the newspaper is referenced. But given how un-neutral and promotional this article is in, it needs to either be rewritten properly from the ground up by someone who is interested or deleted altogether.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Theshowmecanuck (talk) 04:52, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Following a request at WP:REFUND I have restored this as a contested PROD, reverted to the version before the rewrite which prompted the PROD, removed unsourced gossip and added basic references. This is now a very basic stub which could do with (properly sourced) expansion. JohnCD (talk) 11:49, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]