Talk:Michael E. Horowitz

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Michael E. Horowitz article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

When was he appointed as Inspector General?

Current article appears to be a rather uninformative stub, but the answer I was looking for is when he became Inspector General. Shanen (talk) 09:42, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Info Box to the right states: "Assumed office – April 16, 2012". Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 18:42, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 December 2019

Please remove "However, Christopher Steele, the British ex-spy was reported to be a friend of Donald's Trump eldest daughter, Ivanka, for several years by several news organizations, and Ivanka met with Steele about employing him to do work for the Trump Organization, so apparently if Steele was bias he probably was in favor of Trump, not against him, but Steele states that in his line of business being bias in favor of anyone would damage the reputation of his information gathering business." from article/section as it is not pertinent or informative to the subject. I appears to be a biased addition in retaliation to the criticism of the validity of the Steele dossier, as well as the damaging findings of IG Horowitz's report. The subject of this addition is Christopher Steele, makes no connection to Michael Horowitz, and therefore has no place in this article. Qrisjin (talk) 20:21, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. Interstellarity (talk) 00:11, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it because it has nothing, or very little, to do with this person's biography. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 03:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the article for the December 9, 2019, IG report

We have this tiny section:

#Findings of FBI investigation of Russia and Trump

So where's the main article based on this "Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane Investigation"? -- BullRangifer (talk) 03:14, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion related to new (12:38, 30 December 2019, Starship.paint then Shinealittlelight edited) Inspector General report on the Crossfire Hurricane investigation article? X1\ (talk) 23:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good. -- BullRangifer (talk) 23:11, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review of FISA applications, will need work on wording; add here &/or ... ?

The DoJ IG found errors in FBI applications to conduct secret surveillance. Horowitz reviewed 29 FISA applications — submitted between October 2014 and September 2019 — and found problems with all of them. The office said it found an average of about 20 issues per application, including one application with about 65 issues.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/fbi-surveillance-trump-russia-inspector-general/2020/03/31/22274dd0-735c-11ea-a9bd-9f8b593300d0_story.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/31/us/politics/fbi-fisa-wiretap-trump.html
Eric Tucker Watchdog finds new problems with FBI wiretap applications April 1, 2020 Associated Press
Pete Williams FBI was not careful enough in seeking secret surveillance, review finds; The audit of 29 FISA applications showed a lack of compliance with the requirement that factual allegations be properly documented, the DOJ inspector general said. March 31, 2020 NBC News
Josh Gerstein and Kyle Cheney Justice Department audit finds widespread flaws in FBI surveillance applications; The finding by Inspector General Michael Horowitz came after an earlier inquiry found numerous errors in court submissions seeking surveillance of a former Trump campaign adviser. March 31, 2020 Politico

Also see Timeline of investigations into Trump and Russia (2019–2020). X1\ (talk) 06:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Familiy background

Why is there no mention of his and his wife's Israeli family background? - http://aronoff.com/fam9629.html

Note that Investigation report could follow

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ig-probe-fbi-retaliated-jan-6-capitol-protest

Michael Horowitz, the inspector general of the Department of Justice, told House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., and Ranking Member Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, that he would consider launching an investigation into whether the FBI retaliated against agents who attended the Jan. 6, 2021, protest at the U.S. Capitol but who did not enter the building with rioters.

Jordan, citing FBI whistleblowers, urged Horowitz last month to investigate whistleblower claims that "the FBI is suspending the security clearances of FBI employees for their participation in protected First Amendment activity on January 6, 2021." Since a security clearance is required for FBI positions, "these actions mean the FBI has suspended these employees indefinitely."

Horowitz, in a May 4 letter obtained first by Fox News Digital, stopped short of pledging to launch an investigation into the issue, but he did say he would reach out to the FBI and consider whether to open an investigation. "In view of the concern you have raised, we will ask the FBI to provide the bases for the security clearance and personnel actions taken against the employees you reference in your letter," Horowitz said in his letter Wednesday. "Based on the information we receive, we will assess whether to conduct a further review." "In making such an assessment, we will also consider information about other employees who believe the FBI has taken administrative actions against them for engaging in protected activities on January 6, 2021," Horowitz added. 2601:19B:A00:9030:D066:2AF1:477C:7C13 (talk) 16:29, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So insurrection and illegal interference in the proper transfer of power against the will of the people are "protected activities"? We need more context, so please provide reliable sources for this information. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:14, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the source. Per long and unfortunate experience with the deceptive and misinformative nature of Fox News' coverage of American politics, conspiracy theories, and science topics (especially climate change denial, Vaccine hesitancy and COVID19), the community has determined that Fox News is not a reliable source for politics and science topics. See WP:RSP. We prefer better sources, so if there is coverage of this in such sources, please provide them. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:48, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]