Jump to content

Talk:Michael Hayman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I contributed to an article on Michael Hayman which has subsequently been listed as having a conflict of interest.

The article is meant to be as accurate and fair as possible. It is based on a variety of sources and all of the information given in the article is supported by a reference. The aim of the article is to provide some information about a senior figure in the public relations industry.

Could anyone advise on how to resolve this issue or make it appear more impartial? Ukprinfo (talk) 22:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No external links may be given in the body of the article -- we just put a link for the company at the bottom of the page. We try to refrain from what looks like spam advertising. Which edits in particular were you asking about? Let me know on my talk page as I may not visit this article again, thanks. :) Banaticus (talk) 10:13, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is spam advertising for a PR company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.108.140.6 (talk) 15:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the sections which have gone uncited for about a year. I think the rest, although basically stub quality, might meet the notability guideline.
There are enough secondary sources that mention Michael Hayman, although I'm on the fence as to whether they are independent of him. None of the companies he's started have apparently met the notability requirements, that he started them or may do something for them may not be notable. If the article isn't improved in the next month or so, I recommend proposing it for deletion. Banaticus (talk) 17:20, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michael Hayman.png Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Michael Hayman.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:26, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Michael Hayman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Michael Hayman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]