This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.
If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
This article is woefully inadequate in not having virtually any information about the original trial and why the state was able to get a conviction in the first place. It is an example of why Wikipedia remains terribly deficient in providing important information, and why editors are always an important need. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 02:10, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Instead of wasting precious time complaining about it on the talk page, why don't you do something to improve the article? That's the whole point of Wikipedia. C.harrison1988 (talk) 15:53, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Working on John Raley article, feel free to cannibalize it for any info on michael.
Hey y'all. I've been working on a draft for a John Raley WP article and there might be some info or writing there that y'all might wanna cut and paste into this article. I just added a quote into this article from an interview with Raley on the subject, but I'm sure there is or will be stuff in there you all might want to take at some point as well Rejewskifan (talk) 04:13, 26 November 2017 (UTC)