Talk:Michael Walzer

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Philosophy: Philosophers Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iraq War

Did Walzer believe the latest Iraq war was just or unjust?

== No It wasn't just, the Iraq was is unjust.

Almost a year after the above question was posed: unjust. According to the review of his book that is referenced in this article, that is.

- Sorry I can't sign, I'm not really a user.

Paragraph out of Context

Hello, this paragraph seems to be out of context:

Support for Israel´s invasion of Lebanon: "Walzer’s explicit support for the Lebanon war (“I certainly welcome the political defeat of the PLO, and I believe that the limited military operation [sic] required to inflict that defeat can be defended under the theory of just war”; September 8, 1982" Cited from Chomsky’s ‘Fateful Triangle’: An Exchange (Nybooks, 1984)

It seems relevant but should be placed under an appropriate heading. Best, HAGAD (talk) 11:53, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tributes

A section of the article is currently titled "Tributes". Perhaps "Recognition" would be a better term. The section contains some very poor writing in my opinion, especially the line: "Perhaps the highest honor a scholar can achieve is serious attention given by other scholars to his body of work; in this regard Walzer has been greatly honored." There are no references or examples following this bit of text. Stefan Kruithof (talk) 15:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's probably best to drop the sentence in the "Recognition" section listing a particular work that has made use of Walzer's theory. Lots of books have done this, and it actually undersells his influence to include just one. It's also not really recognition in the right sense. (Anyway, a more obvious book, if wanted one, is Brian Orend's "Michael Walzer on War and Justice", since it shows distinctly that Walzer is being discussed.)

I'll revisit this after a while, but if its still the same when I come back, I'll change the section I'm referring to. 173.32.35.78 (talk) 23:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Communitarian

This line is highly problematic, and misleading at best: "Michael Walzer is usually identified as one of the leading proponents of the "Communitarian" position in political theory, along with Alasdair MacIntyre and Michael Sandel." First, weasel words. "Usually identified" by whom??? This is unacceptably vague. I am a political theorist and I do not "usually identify" any of the above as communitarians; that label was never accepted by MacIntyre and Sandel (not sure about Walzer) and has proven to be so problematic and, ultimately, meaningless that it has largely been abandoned. Second, this is highly misleading, since Walzer, Sandel, and MacIntyre have very little in common. This sentence strongly implies that they share a particular "position," which is very definitely false.

The bulk of Walzer's views, at least in the economic sphere, are broadly classifiable as socialist, and if he is going to be given a label, it should be socialist, not communitarian. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reader335 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I watch this page because I have spent a lot of time editing Toleration. Frankly, I had never heard of "communitarian" before, so I have no opinion. I agree that "usually identified" sounds weaselly without a reference. I have no problem with your deleting "communitarian" but please don't add socialist without a source that shows he self-identifies as such. Or maybe we just don't need to label him. Jonathanwallace (talk) 17:57, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms of Walzer's Work?

Walzer's influence in political theory is undoubtedly considerable; however, his work has also generated a great deal of criticism, as many theorists of considerable influence also do. Take for example the criticism of Walzer's justification of United States interventionism from Noam Chomsky, or the dialog between Walzer and James B. Rule on the subject of Israel. Joeyvandernaald (talk) 23:29, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Walzer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007120520/http://www.barcelonametropolis.cat/en/page.asp?id=22&ui=407 to http://www.barcelonametropolis.cat/en/page.asp?id=22&ui=407

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Michael Walzer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:01, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Walzer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727172803/http://acheret.co.il/en/?cmd=articles.312&act=read&id=1975 to http://acheret.co.il/en/?cmd=articles.312&act=read&id=1975

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:42, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]