Jump to content

Talk:Michiel de Ruyter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Michiel de Ruyter/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

great article!

Last edited at 09:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 23:58, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michiel de Ruyter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:27, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled section

[edit]

In the notes section, there are multiple references to prud'homme 1996 but no indication of what work is being referenced. A google search turns up a book on the dangers of decentralization, which is unlikely to be the reference in question. Silencioseosamh (talk) 19:26, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]