Talk:Little Brown Jug (college football trophy)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Little brown jug link[edit]

If you search for Little Brown Jug, you get sent to an article about a harness race. I think the football trophy (the grandfather of all rivalry trophies) should be the primary link, or at least lead to a disambiguation page.--RLent 19:24, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

go blue! __earth (Talk) 10:04, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Michigan BlockM.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Michigan BlockM.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:47, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


The Little Brown Jug
Michigan (64) Minnesota (22)
1909 1910
1920 1921
1922 1923
1924 1925
1926 1926
1929 1930
1931 1932
1943 1944
1945 1946
1947 1948
1949 1951
1952 1954
1955 1957
1958 1959
1964 1966
1968 1969
1970 1971
1972 1973
1974 1975
1976 1978
1979 1980
1981 1982
1983 1984
1985 1987
1988 1989
1990 1991
1992 1993
1994 1995
1996 1997
1998 2001
2002 2003
2004 2006
1919 1927
1934 1935
1936 1937
1938 1939
1940 1941
1942 1953
1956 1960
1961 1962
1963 1965
1967 1977
1986 2005
Ties (3)
1903 1933 1950

Image copyright problem with Image:MichiganWolverines.png[edit]

The image Image:MichiganWolverines.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Oldest Continuous Rivalry[edit]

The oldest continuous college football rivalry is between Lehigh and Lafayette (uninterupted since 1897). This predates both claims of the Little Brown Jug and Territorial Cup. The Lehigh-Lafayette doesn't have a trophy, but is still an older rivalry ... this article should be updated to reflect this. Jrssr5 19:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Indeed, its the oldest "trophy game", I've readded some of the clarification language, tightened the prose, and noted that it isn't necessarily the "oldest rivalry".—Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobak (talkcontribs)
Great, thanks, I tried a little cleaning up, but didn't want to go overboard. Jrssr5 21:16, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Not to mention as far as I know this is hardly "continuous"-- the two UMs don't even play each other in 2009 and '10. Some rivalry. Lmeister (talk) 16:11, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
And although the Territorial cup may be an older trophy, it disappeared after the 1899 game and did not reappear until the 1980s and was not exchanged until 2001. Group29 (talk) 13:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)


In the article, and in the University of Minnesota media guide, the jug is listed as "earthenware", and may actually be a a piece of "stoneware" crockery from Red Wing Pottery. Anyone have access to the Red Wing Collector's Society article on the Little Brown Jug? This might explain why it has held up for more than 100 years without any recorded breakings. Group29 (talk) 14:13, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

It's definitely made of stoneware, but some folks will argue that stoneware is a subclass of earthenware. On the issue of whether the jug survived, it's a interesting question and explored in detail here Little Brown Jug Lore VI: Is the Greatest Trophy in College Football a Fake?. On a few occasions Oscar Munson claimed it was damaged (handle broken) and in the 1960s before he died claimed it was replaced. I've tried, but I can't find any source or evidence that backs up Munson's claim beyond a reference in the Minnesota Daily that the jug was repaired in the early 1920s.

Speaking of composition, the photo of the jug in the display case is a replica. Gregdooley (talk) 21:08, 14 March 2010 (UTC)


Something on the jug's theft from Michigan's campus in I believe the 1940s and subsequent return and identification by a flaw would be nice.

Re: "the theft", Here's a good place to start. It has a blow by blow of what happened between 1931 and 1933 when the jug was missing Gregdooley (talk) 22:49, 6 May 2013 (UTC)gregdooley

University of Michigan Project[edit]

University of Michigan is not represented with a project at Category:WikiProject Universities. Please comment at Talk:University_of_Michigan#Should_University_of_Michigan_have_a_project.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:10, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 22:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Little Brown Jug (American football)Michigan–Minnesota football rivalry – This page talks about the rivalry and shows the entire history of it, so therefore it should be moved to this title. (talk) 02:04, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move[edit]

This article was moved from Little Brown Jug (American football) to Michigan–Minnesota football rivalry after an IP user requested the move and no discussion followed. The title should be reverted at this time. This series is commonly know at the "Little Brown Jug" game. It is not generally or commonly known as the Mich-Minn football rivalry. Further, the "Little Brown Jug" is one of the truly iconic and oldest (maybe the oldest) traveling trophies in the sport. Cbl62 (talk) 19:56, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Support move - I support this proposed move per nominator Cbl62's stated rationale, provided appropriate redirects are created and maintained for Michigan–Minnesota football rivalry and Minnesota–Michigan football rivalry per the general rule for naming CFB rivalry articles. Please note that my support for this move expressly recognizes that this is an exception to the general rule, per the nominator, not an invitation to begin wholesale moves of CFB rivalry game articles to article titles based on the names of obscure rivalry trophies. Selah. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:06, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Support. The Jug makes this game, not the matchup. It hasn't been a competitive rivalry in decades and I suspect it would garner little attention each year if not for the 100+ year history of the oldest trophy in college sports, accompanied by its colorful backstory. It helps too that the teams had hardly begun playing one another before the trophy was introduced. This rivalry has been "The Little Brown Jug" game practically since the two teams came into existence. JohnInDC (talk) 20:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Support move as the obvious WP:COMMONNAME, per Cbl62. Ejgreen77 (talk) 01:56, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Support per nominator's reason. Corkythehornetfan | Chat? 02:00, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Similarly with other college football rivalry games, descriptive names seem to be a common way of referring to this game. I find 1,520 Google Books hits for "Michigan-Minnesota game", 749 for "Michigan-Minnesota football", compared to 1700 for "Little Brown Jug" football. This is hardly overwhelming evidence that "Little Brown Jug" is better known, and additionally, a descriptive title will be much more recognizable to any reader than the name of the trophy. Additionally, as this isn't the primary topic of the base name Little Brown Jug, the current title avoids the parenthetical disambiguation per WP:NATURALDIS.--Cúchullain t/c 05:23, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
@Cuchullain: Cooch, as a general proposition, I agree with you about the naming of college sports rivalries, and we have closely aligned in the past regarding the naming of rivalry articles. In this particular case, however, I see an obvious exception to the general rule (as I noted in my comment above). Your Google Books statistics also bare closer examination. Here's some additional stats from Google Books searches, and a quick analysis thereof:
1. "Michigan-Minnesota game" - initially indicates 1,520 results, but only returns 25 actual results, usually indicating a huge number of duplicates or other search error; the top result is The Little Brown Jug: The Michigan-Minnesota Rivalry;
2. "Michigan-Minnesota football rivalry" - initially indicates 79 results, but only returns 17 actual results, only 4 or 5 of which appear to be about college football; the second result is The Little Brown Jug: The Michigan-Minnesota Rivalry, following the subject Wikipedia article;
3. "Michigan-Minnesota rivalry" - initially indicates 49 results, but only displays 12 actual results; top result The Little Brown Jug: The Michigan-Minnesota Rivalry;
4. "Gophers-Wolverines" - 7 results;
5. "'Little Brown Jug' + Wolverines" - initially indicates 688 results, but only returns 121 actual results, and virtually all are references to the CFB rivalry; and
6. "'Little Brown Jug' + Gophers" - initially indicates 542 results, but only displays 118 actual results.
After scrutiny of the Google Books stats, it appears "Little Brown Jug" is the best statistical result for Google Books name search for the rivalry. Additional variations on the search strings may yield somewhat different results, but reliance on raw "hit" numbers from Google Books (or any other unanalyzed internet search) can be problematic, as you know. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:09, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Support move per arguments of Cbl62 and Dirtlawyer1. Jweiss11 (talk) 19:24, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

This requested move discussion has been open for almost three months, and there has been a clear consensus supporting the restoration of the original article title since February 1, 2015, with no further comments since then. In light of the circumstances, I have executed the requested move per the discussion above. The previous article title, Michigan–Minnesota football rivalry, which is also the standard title format for college football rivalry articles, now redirects to the present article title, Little Brown Jug (college football trophy). Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:28, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Little Brown Jug (college football trophy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:11, 24 May 2017 (UTC)