|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Microkernel article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
|This talk page is automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. Any threads with no replies in 90 days may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived.|
Please do not merge
The microkernel concept is best discussed as a topic by itself. The microkernel subject is vast and interesting enough to be independent discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk • contribs) 13:19, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Merging with "Kernel" article
A merging of the article "microkernel" with the "kernel" article was proposed because of the possibility of producing "redundant information" between the two. Redundancy did exist at the time of the proposal. Moving the material permanentyl to "kernel" would have resulted in a redirect from "microkernel" and avoidance of such redudancy.
However, many agreed the microkernel concept is "best discussed as a topic by itself" and warranted "independent discussion". One was hesitant to adding material on microkernels to the "kernel" article because it consequently "would seriously weigh down" the latter.
The article originally also had material that slighted microkernels, rather than explaining. Since then, more descriptive material on microkernels found on the L4 kernel and Mach kernel pages has been transferred to the microkernel article. The material at "Kernel" has been moved to the "microkernel" article, and reduandant edits should now be avoided.
I would concur with the addition of Singularity and the merging of the topics until the size of the content dictates otherwise. dru — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk • contribs) 20:11, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
Nanokernel section should be removed
I am not aware of any significant use of the term Nanokernel other than what essentially appears to be a catchy name for a microkernel. Even the referred KeyKOS paper implies that the KeyKOS nanokernel is, in fact, a microkernel: "What sets KeyKOS apart from other microkernels is...". I therefore propose to remove the whole section on the grounds that nanokernel is rather a fringe term used to market one specific product. All in all, it brings no benefit to the Microkernel page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjermar (talk • contribs) 10:04, 14 September 2016 (UTC)