Talk:Mikhail Markhasev
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]from VfD:he'll
Move this article to the general article on Bill Cosby. Subject is unnoteworthy otherwise.--Ensrifraff 17:22, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- apparently another orphaned vfd page Wolfman 19:39, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Merge into Ennis Cosby. - SimonP 04:45, Dec 16, 2004 (UTC)
- Merge and Redirect to either Ennis Cosby or Bill Cosby. Geogre 05:08, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete with extreme prejudice, murder is not an easy ticket to notability. Wyss 11:18, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Actually, it is. It just requires murdering more than one marginally notable person. Also, "easy" is debatable. Delete. --fvw* 19:24, 2004 Dec 16 (UTC)
- Yeah well, serial killers get points for staying on message I guess. Wyss 23:51, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- The fact that Ennis was murdered is what is important to history, not the name of the man's killer. Giving fame (or notoriety) to those who commit such anonymous crimes is a disservice to our collective humanity, and has no place in any forum. "A thug", "A Ukranian immigrant", or some other more generic term are more appropriate to describe that person. Further, he does not deserve an article of his own--it's unfortunate enough that he need be mentioned at all, but if so, keep him as a footnote at the bottom of the article about Ennis.
end moved discussion