Talk:Mimicry in plants
 | Mimicry in plants has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 29, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vitalityegg.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:08, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Lobelia cardinalis
[edit]The photo of Lobelia cardinalis is confusing. What is it mimicking? Moreover, the statement that this species attracts hummingbirds without producing nectar is simply wrong. See: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2425970# 98.192.193.83 (talk) 17:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- It was reliably verifiable in 1981 ... the paper you cite does seem to disprove this, though almost in passing as it doesn't mention the 'attracts without nectar' hypothesis. What would it be mimicking? A juicy nectar-producer, i.e. itself (a form of automimicry, a known thing). Guess we'll have to replace the image. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)