A fact from Monument to the King's Liverpool Regiment appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 November 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that the 1905 monument to the King's Liverpool Regiment depicts soldiers from 1685 (pictured), 1743 and 1902? "A soldier of 1685 stands at the left end of the wall and a soldier of 1902 stands at the right end of the wall." and "Below this is the figure of a drummer boy dressed in the uniform of 1743." from: "Kings Liverpool Regiment Boer War". Imperial War Museums. Retrieved 4 November 2021.
Overall: Article is new enough, long enough and copyvio via earwig 'unlikely'. The image is free to use, clear. QPQ is done. Nice to have this for Remembrance Sunday. Lajmmoore (talk) 12:17, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Dumelow and Lajmmoore: Hi there! The article is well done, nice work! I'm having a hard time seeing how the hooks are interesting in their own right, although they are interesting with an image slot. How about
Fine by me, if it has to run without an image. I've added a source for the English version of the motto as the army uses a non-literal translation (more literally it is something like "frightened not by difficulty") - Dumelow (talk) 16:13, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fine by! I found them interesting, but forget to examine whether I had a bias (I did!) - great reminder for my reviewing! thanks for picking it up. Lajmmoore (talk) 17:05, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2 is 142 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting. ALT2 fact verified by ref 6, which is a reliable source. —Bloom6132 (talk) 02:06, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]