Talk:Mumbai Monorail

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mumbai Monorail article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

India: Maharashtra / Mumbai Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Mumbai (assessed as Mid-importance).

Trains: in India / Monorail Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	October 20, 2013

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian railways.
	This article is supported by the Monorail task force.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Mumbai Monorail.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Mumbai Monorail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Line 1 (Mumbai Monorail)

The contents of these two articles are hopelessly overlapping, and there is no realistic prospect of Mumbai building additional monorail lines in the foreseeable future. It's time to merge these two articles together. Jpatokal (talk) 00:13, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bump. Going once, going twice... Jpatokal (talk) 07:04, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Let's turn two bloated articles into one and then trim the fat Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 20:34, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've finally plunged forward and done this. Last call for rescuing content from the Line 1 article before I redirect it. Jpatokal (talk) 22:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]