Talk:NVivo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Software / Computing  (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.
 
WikiProject Sociology (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Ad?[edit]

Am I the only one who feels like this entry reads like an advertisement? I may do a bit of searching and see if the text is cribbed directly from an ad. As is, though, it seems to offer little info about the programs actual uses, but lots of buzzwords and excessive bits of info.

If I'm just being grumpy, please say so. But I'm wondering if others feel similarly.

Mgllama (talk) 19:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


I completely agree -- the neutrality of this page is definitely suspect. taqwoman 18:20, 6 Sept 200969.159.4.247 (talk) 22:17, 6 September 2009 (UTC)


Agreed. This page is very non-wiki and very vendory sounding. Randomdestructn (talk) 19:38, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

I agree, this is marketing copy.

Ashooner (talk) 00:28, 5 May 2010 (UTC)


This article is the Nvivo marketing brochure: Nvivo 8 Brochure PDF —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashooner (talkcontribs) 00:37, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

It's not only potentially biased, it also does an incredibly poor job of describing what the software actually does. It's full of vague descriptions which are designed to sound impressive, but doesn't explain the basic functions to someone who has never used it. 158.143.82.199 (talk) 16:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

References[edit]

Here's a free access paper if anyone wants a paper citation.

http://caqdas.soc.surrey.ac.uk/QUICworkingpapers.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.194.12.238 (talk) 16:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NVivo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:54, 11 February 2018 (UTC)