Talk:Naomi Clark (90210 character)

Naomi Clark (90210 character) was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 20, 2010	Peer review	Reviewed
August 16, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
August 6, 2012	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Infobox image

The infobox image is from season 1. However, all other TV shows have an image from the most current season. I feel it should be the same for this. Please give an opinion if you think it should be the current image used or one from the current season. Jayy008 (talk) 14:26, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As we're not the official Website of the show, I don't think our mission is to constantly update with the most recent picture (and not all other TV character articles do this, actually). Instead, I think we should focus on providing the most fitting one. (A similar issue was raised over on Talk:Madelyne Pryor). In the current image, she looks rather perched and poised (befitting a high society girl), and is sitting in a shady area (befitting an antiheroine). It's a highly appropriate image for the character described in the article, IMO.

Also, there's no noticeable difference between a Season 1 picture and a Season 2 picture in this case (or even a Season 3 picture) because the actress hasn't aged much, or changed her appearance. -- James26 (talk) 17:48, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Naomi Clark/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: HGraphite (talk) 02:38, 29 June 2010 (UTC) Hello! I have found just a few problems with this article.[reply]

There are three dead links, check them here [1]

Remedied (the third link is actually working, though the page report says otherwise). -- James26 (talk) 05:18, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the header you should provide a reference when you refer to her being praised by Los Angeles Times, Entertainment Weekly, and People magazine.

Remedied -- James26 (talk) 05:18, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Currently undone, per WP:LEADCITE -- James26 (talk) 14:54, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now, I'm gonna need a second reviewer to review the prose, but until then, I will put this article on hold. HGraphite (talk) 02:38, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. Just wait for another editor to review the prose, and you should have it. Congrats. HGraphite (talk) 05:27, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the issues I found with the article:

I'm not convinced of the rationale to have File:TSMcCord.jpg in the article; the lead image is plenty I think.
"In the third installment," installment's probably not the best word; do you mean third episode?

Those are the only couple issues I found: I'll put the article on hold and pass it when this is handled. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 22:21, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to review this. I've adjusted the wording. Regarding the image, is it really that big of a problem? It's there to provide a visual illustration of notability, and it only brings the total number of images to a mere two (I've already removed a third). The Todd Manning article (rated GA) uses a similar image to illustrate notability, and contains far more than two images. I'll remove it if you insist, but can these points be considered first? -- James26 (talk) 01:37, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's too many fair use images on Manning, personally; a couple could probably be removed. As for this article, it does help to combine the real-world aspect and the fictional character, so there's at least a sort of rationale that can be established for it. As such, I'll pass the article. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:04, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. -- James26 (talk) 02:46, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Individual editor reached consensus to delist in 2012. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Naomi Clark/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Reassessment by the original GA nominator (haven't contributed for a while). Large chunks of unverified, messy material added. Intent is to demote article to "B" class. -- James26 (talk) 00:25, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Naomi Clark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Naomi Clark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100115062836/http://recapist.com/2008/10/30/90210-theres-no-place-like-homecoming-episode-8 to http://www.recapist.com/2008/10/30/90210-theres-no-place-like-homecoming-episode-8

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Naomi Clark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:00, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]