Jump to content

Talk:Nardcore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article would benefit from talking about what nardcore actually sounds like and how it's different from normal hardcore. I have no idea after reading the article and it's the primary piece of information that would be of interest to those who stumble across it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.195.48 (talk) 18:17, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If Nardcore related albums are going to be listed, it should be all albums from all bands. As it was, until two bands were added, it was compilations only. There needs to be a standard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maluka (talkcontribs)

There's no need for every list to be exhaustive. If notable albums aren't listed, consider adding them and linking to the album's article here. -- Mikeblas 14:14, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not all bands have albums, demos in many cases. Also, Ventura bands are NOT to be listed as Nardcore. Please check before adding. Thank you. Maluka 07:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tone

[edit]

I see that some editors have been working on this page, so I'll take the time to note that I'm cleaning up the tone of the first part some -- it's out of line with Wikipedia's current stance on hyperbole and flowery language about bands and artists. Hope no one thinks I'm trying to slight the Nardcore scene, but (for instance) 'legendary' would definitely be a stretch. :) Eaglizard 05:59, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nardcore.jpg

[edit]

Image:Nardcore.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mdpv2 lterecords.jpg

[edit]

Image:Mdpv2 lterecords.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

M.I.A. as a Nardcore band?

[edit]

M.I.A. may be somewhat connected with the early So Cal Scene, though the band was really from Las Vegas and came out to So Cal for a while to do shows and be a part of the vibrant scene going on in Los Angeles and Orange County at the time. I've never heard them referred to as a Nardcore band before, nor do I associate their sound or approach with most Nardcore bands of their era. Really, the evolution of M.I.A. from a hardcore band to more punk, post-punk and ambient approaches parallels roughly paralles the growth of a later notable band of note from Reno, Nevada, namely the influential 7 Seconds.

 The Wikipedia article on M.I.A., which credits them as hailing from Orange County... [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M.I.A._(band) ].  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.244.32.127 (talk) 13:16, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply] 

---An early Nardcore band from Ventura, w/spiderheads Joe Eddy, Johnny Brewton and Nardcore legend Mr.Dave Casillas...they played numerous shows throughout So. Cal and are on a compilation album titled "Life is Beautiful so Why Not Eat Health Foods" (germs, vox pop, minutemen) with cover art by Raymond Pettibone. The Ventura M.I.A. formed in 1980 which makes them the original M.I.A. Later joined by Angry Samoans guitarist P.J. Galligan. The name stays. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maluka (talkcontribs) 14:26, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nardcore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:28, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]