From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


The "history" section had been replaced by a less informative "biography" that sounded more like PR / hype, and was far too emotive and POV. It also seemed like the "biography" was the work of a single editor whereas the "history" has been developed / refined by a number of people. So for both of those reasons I reverted to the more detailed and more wikified history text. Hope I'm not treading on anyone's toes - feel free to discuss. (talk) 05:41, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

No, totally agree. The bio you removed was a straight cut and paste from their MySpace page. --BrianFG (talk) 22:31, 19 August 2009 (UTC)