Talk:New Farm Cinemas
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph of exterior of New Farm Cinemas be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Brisbane may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Description
[edit]This article raises the occasional headache I've raised before about the description sections in that very large parts of this section are clearly out of date - that the Blue Room is gone entirely is the largest thing, but it's obvious from the article Kerry cited that significant enough internal alterations have been made to the rest that much of the current content regarding them is also outdated. As it stands, the description section is flat-out wrong, but it'd be a shame to lose it entirely - any thoughts about what to do? The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:08, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- I take an incremental and collaborative view to Wikipedia articles rather than a perfectionist view. I figure that something is better than nothing, and then if someone can improve on that, then it's better than it was. As it stands, the description is perfectly reasonable for the theatre as it was prior to the demolition of the Blue Room and subsequent construction of the multiplex. Maybe the simplest thing is to put a quality tag to that effect in the description section. I think there is a tag for out-of-date information. I will investigate and add as appropriate. Kerry (talk) 00:36, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Good suggestion and done. The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:45, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, you just beat me to it (mine was an edit conflict)! Thanks! Kerry (talk) 00:47, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- I think I have addressed a lot of the problems in the article now. What I can't address is the fact that the Queensland Heritage Register is so out of alignment with reality, but that's Someone Else's Problem. Kerry (talk) 22:10, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Seems like a smart solution. Ta! The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- I think I have addressed a lot of the problems in the article now. What I can't address is the fact that the Queensland Heritage Register is so out of alignment with reality, but that's Someone Else's Problem. Kerry (talk) 22:10, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, you just beat me to it (mine was an edit conflict)! Thanks! Kerry (talk) 00:47, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Good suggestion and done. The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:45, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- B-Class Brisbane articles
- Low-importance Brisbane articles
- WikiProject Brisbane articles
- B-Class Queensland articles
- Low-importance Queensland articles
- WikiProject Queensland articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Articles with conflicting quality ratings
- C-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Brisbane