Talk:New Town Hall, Ostrava

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi, this image is a suspected copyright violation and may soon be deleted from the Commons:. If your Wikipedia allows fair use, please consider uploading the image locally. Thank you. skINMATE

Proposed move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: New City Hall, Ostrava moved to New Town Hall, Ostrava. No consensus on whether a comma or parens should be used to disambiguate and, rather than muddying this RM, I'd suggest starting a new RM that focuses solely on that issue. Jenks24 (talk) 11:32, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]



– "Nová radnice" is more commonly translated as New Town Hall. [1] [2] [3]. The comma convention is used to disambiguate cities and neighborhoods, not buildings. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 07:30, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. Comma for cities and neighborhoods, parentheses for buildings does seem to be the format we follow. Zarcadia (talk) 10:56, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose parentheses, but support "town hall". Actually, we use both forms for buildings as any look at categories for buildings will confirm. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Town Hall, Ostrava. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]