Talk:Nick Hits (TV programming block)
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Nick Hits (programming block))
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 10 January 2019
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. (page mover nac) -- Flooded. Treated like dirt by many admins since 2016 (sig inspired by Hullaballoo) (talk) 19:06, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- Nick Hits (programming block) → Nick Hits (TV programming block)
- Crunch (programming block) → Crunch (TV programming block)
- Noise (programming block) → Noise (TV programming block)
- Mixy (programming block) → Mixy (TV programming block)
– Although it is not mentioned in WP:NCTV and doesn't fit "(television)" (WP:NCTV#Articles about television), "programming block" seems to best describe these. However, as "programming block" can mean several things, including Block (programming), but also a programming block on a different medium (radio), per WP:NCTV we add the medium type to the disambiguation, see: "(TV series)"/"(TV program)"/"(TV station)" vs "(radio series)"/"(radio program)"/"(radio station)". Gonnym (talk) 09:48, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support no point in having misleading parenthetical dabs. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:41, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support - in the spirit of WP:NCBC as well to clearly delineate TV vs radio. -- Netoholic @ 10:45, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Sure – adding the word "TV" to the disambiguator here is better than it not being there. That said, I'm still uncomfortable with the idea of using "TV programming block" as a disambiguator (though neither do I have a better suggestion...). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:27, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.