Talk:No nit policy/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about No nit policy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Orphaned references in School head lice policy
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of School head lice policy's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Burgess1995":
- From Head-louse infestation: Burgess IF (1995). "Human lice and their management". Advances in Parasitology. 36: 271–342. PMID 7484466.
- From Head louse: Burgess IF (1995). "Human lice and their management". Advances in parasitology. 36: 271–342. PMID 7484466.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- AnomieBOT, you rock. Noca2plus (talk) 00:33, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
GA review
A review has started. Comments are here. SilkTork *YES! 18:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- The article did not meet the GA criteria. It may be resubmitted when issues have been addressed. See Talk:School head lice policy/GA1 for full explanation and suggestions. SilkTork *YES! 19:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
WP:NURSE priority check
I have rated this article as 'low' importance according to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Nursing/Assessment#Importance_scale. If you disagree, please leave a note here so we can discuss it. Honestly, I'm not even completely sure it belongs in the nursing wikiproject at all. Cheers, Basie (talk) 12:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Do you have a suggestion as to what wikiproject it might fall under? It seems a bit removed from WP:MED because it focuses primarily on school policy rather than the disease itself. I thought the nursing project would be good because it is the school nurse that is primarily responsible for setting and executing such policies. Noca2plus (talk) 20:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I've since been informed of that by someone over at WP:MED so I guess this is just one of those areas I know little about! ;) I thought it would sit nicely under the education project, but there's no reason it can't be in both. Cheers, Basie (talk) 00:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)