This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Notarium is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile
Notarium is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird
This article is part of WikiProject Animal anatomy, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to animal anatomy apart from human anatomy. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Animal anatomy. This project is an offshoot of WikiProject AnimalsAnimal anatomyWikipedia:WikiProject Animal anatomyTemplate:WikiProject Animal anatomyAnimal anatomy
I'm not sure the "Veterinary Medicine" stub is the most appropriate. Maybe it is, but veterinary medicine has nothing to do with pterosaurs (or most birds for that matter) -- I preferred the broader biology stub. -- John.Conway14:47, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think this would be merged into some other article. It is a very obscure term, and it is unlikely to become much of an article that wouldn't be better of summarised elsewhere. FunkMonk (talk) 10:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Eh, I can't think of one that fits. Besides, what's the harm in a few short articles dealing with less common anatomical structures? HCA (talk) 03:45, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
