Talk:O-I super-heavy tank

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the O-I super-heavy tank article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / Asian / Japanese / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	World War II task force

Japan C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 06:30, November 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

C

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

O-I super heavy tank.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:21, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

O-I Nomenclature and Turret Count

We know that the translation of "O-I" in unabbreviated form meant "Big - 1," so why is it "O-I" instead of "O-1"

Furthermore, almost every other source and depiction of the O-I shows only a single turret in the rear, not two. Can we please change the last sentence in the third paragraph from: "The rear hull was designed to have two more smaller turrets..." to "The rear hull was designed to have another small turret..."?

In addition to this, almost every other existing depiction of the O-I gave the two frontal turrets a 47 mm cannon, can we also update the page to reflect this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.137.16.64 (talk) 00:10, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

72.137.16.64 Can't exactly answer your second or third question, I can answer your first. オイ車 was the name of the tank in Japanese army nomenclature. It used the Iroha alphabet in which numbers 1-7 are pronounced "Iro wa nioedo" (Modern). They then just took the first letter 'I' and used that. Hope this clears everything up :) FORMULA1FAN71 (talk) 04:03, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Main gun confusion

In the article the main weapon is listed as the 105mm Type 92 cannon, but most of the documentation we got, especially the blueprints shown in this very article, cleary state it was meant to mount a 149mm Type 96 howitzer instead. Wouldn't it make more sense to add that gun to the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8A0:57A9:DC01:C4D4:F0FB:D0A2:52A9 (talk) 12:27, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]