Talk:Omonoia Square

Greece: Athens Mid‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Athens task force.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Urban studies and planning

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

File:Omonoia Square 1900.tif Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Omonoia Square 1900.tif, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Omonoia Square 1900.tif)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:37, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Omonia

NO CONSENSUS

This discussion has been open since 2017 and there has been inadequate participation to properly assess consensus. While there is no real opposition that has not been reasonably refuted, the general lack of participation makes it not possible to interpret any consensus. Based on this, I am closing this discussion as no consensus. If an RfC is to be filed, I would recommend reaching out to the opposer to see if there remains any unresolved issues, solicit opinions at relevant WikiProjects, and attempt to reach a broader community in general so that consensus either way can actually be established.

Pinging those involved so that they are aware as this is an old discussion @Odythal, Klbrain, The Banner, and The Gnome: --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 22:16, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I note that the recent merge to Omonoia has been partially reversed by The Banner, with a justification in the edit summary that the merge proposal wasn't visible. It is true that there wasn't a template on the Omonoia Square page, but there was one on the Omonoia page since:

10:14, 29 March 2015‎ Odythal

So, this was a proposal uncontested for almost 2.5 years; the merge seems perfectly reasonable given that the suburb is centred on the square and their histories are inextricably intertwined. Given that it wasn't tagged here, I agree that it is reasonable to reopen the discussion. I therefore propose reinstating the merge, on the grounds that the subjects benefit from being discussed together, and that the Omonoia page without the square is very small. Klbrain (talk) 10:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as it will mess up Template:Landmarks in Athens and Template:Streets in Athens that both link specifically to the square, not to the neighbourhood. Both articles need improvement. The Banner talk 19:03, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- That's easily resolved by linking the redirect to a section for the square on the Omonoia page, or use the Anchor template. It is also true that both need improvement, and the Omonoia page is so small it will greatly benefit from a merge. Klbrain (talk) 20:05, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. The two articles are practically about the exact same place. Every source one can find in Greek uses the term 'Omonoia' to denote both the eponymous square and the surrounding area. That is because the two are synonymous, which is why the Greek-language Wikipedia only has one article under the title 'Omonoia' with information about the square and the surrounding area. -The Gnome (talk) 10:06, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

New Omonia Square Athens.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:23, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Πλατεία Ομονοίας (Omonia Square).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:53, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]