Talk:Ontario Highway 148

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Ontario Highway 148 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
November 12, 2011 Good article nominee Listed
WikiProject Canada / Ontario (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
WikiProject Canada Roads / Ontario (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of the Canada Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in Canadian provinces, territories and counties. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics Ontario blank.svg Ontario  
Note icon
This article needs a map.
Note icon
This article has a KML file.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ontario Highway 148/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 10:37, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

I'll review this one.--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:37, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:


1b. The article complies with the MoS, except in respect of WP:LEAD. The lead should be expanded a bit to summarize the entire article better - the most important pieces of information pertaining to the route description should be there, as well as the most general info about route history. 2b. The last sentence of the "History" section requires some sort of referencing.

The article is generally good, except for the lead and a referencing issue. I'll place the GAN on hold for now.--Tomobe03 (talk) 13:00, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing this article as well! I've made some fixes; I think the lead could use a little more substance yet. However, more importantly, I noticed that I'm using a source from 1980 to establish the 1983 opening date for the highway. I'm going to let this hang on hold for a couple days so I can make a trip to the library and fire up the microfiche's. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 17:08, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
No problem, that sounds like a reasonable thing to do.--Tomobe03 (talk) 17:11, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Wasn't much help unfortunately. The mid-70s to early-80s is one of the periods of time where there are seemingly no sources for highways in Ontario. As such, I've referenced the earliest map (January 1984) to contain the route as a reference to it opening before that, and the contract for the final paving of the bypass of Highway 17 in 1982 to reference it opening after that. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 18:52, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Will do. Nice work.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:31, 12 November 2011 (UTC)