Talk:Open educational resources

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Suggested merge[edit]

From Open-source curriculum - looks very similar (??) --K (talk) 15:29, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Kauppinen[edit]

I just spent some time trying to find the text of this paper and read it, I cannot find any supporting text about open education resources in that paper so I am removing the section. curb the ''[[commodification]] of [[knowledge]]''<ref>{{cite journal|last=Kauppinen|first=Ilkka|title=Different meanings of 'knowledge as commodity' in the context of higher education|journal=Critical Sociology|date=29 January 2013|doi=10.1177/0896920512471218|url=http://crs.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/01/29/0896920512471218.abstract|accessdate=23 April 2013}}</ref> and

You can read the full text of that paper here : https://www.academia.edu/4680305/Different_Meanings_of_Knowledge_as_Commodity_in_the_Context_of_Higher_Education http://www.scribd.com/doc/288942462/Different-Meanings-of-Knowledge-as-Commodity-in-the-Context-of-Higher-Education-Kauppinennnnssssn https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270638834_Different_Meanings_of_%27Knowledge_as_Commodity%27_in_the_Context_of_Higher_Education James Michael DuPont (talk) 03:01, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Essentially contested concept removed[edit]

I have removed this reference to Scanlon that was added in this edit : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Open_educational_resources&diff=prev&oldid=551976602

The original editor is retired, I cannot validate this claim without spending $30, it does not add much to the article. Open educational resources are an [[Essentially contested concept|essentially contested]] <ref>{{cite journal|last=Scanlon|first=Eileen|title=Digital futures: Changes in scholarship, open educational resources and the inevitability of interdisciplinarity|journal=Arts and Humanities in Higher Education|year=2012|month=February/March|doi=10.1177/1474022211429279|volume=11|pages=177-184|url=http://ahh.sagepub.com/content/11/1-2/177}}</ref> James Michael DuPont (talk) 22:26, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

OER Research[edit]

Here is a link to a current article on OER research based on the COUP framework, found in Bliss (2013). It is a class project hoping to be finished within the next couple of weeks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Peteforsyth/OER_research_Wikidojo_article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bodily11 (talkcontribs) 18:49, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Open educational resources. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

  • Attempted to fix sourcing for //www.opencontent.org/home.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:10, 31 March 2016 (UTC)