This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
The article states that the ships had displacements of 200 to 400 tons. How sure are we that these are displacements? It is much more likely that the tonnages are burthens (bm). Acad Ronin (talk) 15:05, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Just glanced at Google Books, and the first thing to come up was not only an example of use of "Ostend Company" but included an assertion that this was the common name: "the company generally known by the title of the Ostend Company". This is only to set the ball rolling in terms of discussion. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 12:05, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And notwithstanding a recent edit summary, I'm not sure there's any basis for confusion: a general Google search for "Ostend Company" only turns up those words used of something that is not this company at the very bottom of the third page of results. This is just one straw in the wind, but it does suggest a relatively strong wind. Should it become necessary, hatnotes and disambiguation pages can be employed to avoid any potential for confusion. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 12:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree. There is a clear common thread in the titles of the books and articles already cited in the article too. There are better ways to disambig if the issue arose. —Brigade Piron (talk) 14:04, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]