User talk:Lubiesque

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Lubiesque, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Button sig.png or Insert-signature.png or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! — Bill william comptonTalk 16:24, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Commonwealth (in English and in French)[edit]

Hi! I see that you're new to Wikipedia... it can be daunting, can't it? But rewarding. I also see you've done some good work thus far on articles relating to French India, which is great because I've always felt the articles on non-British India are a little lacking. But on the topic of the Commonwealth, I'd like to point you to WP:CON, WP:NOR, WP:UNDUE and, relating to your question about the term "Commonwealth realm" on the French wiki, WP:CIV. We use the term "Commonwealth realm" is because it's been used in reliable sources and provides a catchall term to refer to those 16 countries. This is a longstanding consensus here and was adopted as a matter of course on the French encyclopedia. Remember to assume good faith, as well. I hope this has been helpful, and I look forward to working with you on the project! Cheers -- MichiganCharms (talk) 01:45, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Enclave and exclave[edit]

Please review WP:NOR and WP:SYNTH. You did a good job writing it, but it reads like original research, or even that it was copied. You need to source information. You can use your sandbox (there's a link at the top of this page called My Sandbox) to write your full edit and add citations.

Also, don't do any further reverts. You're just on the cusp of WP:3RR, and you don't want to go there. I've seen a lot of good editors get bad marks because of it. SkepticalRaptor (talk) 18:46, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Enclaves and Exclaves of the European Union[edit]

I have reverted that section titled Enclaves and exclaves of the European Union. Some have criticized part of it in Talk, but the whose section makes no sense. If you start creating enclaves and exclaves to non-state entities, then we are entering fantasyland and there is no end in sight. By the same token, I could say that Cuba is an exclave of the Organisation of American States, that this and that country is an enclave or an exclave of the Arab League, or ASEAN, or NATO, etc.--Lubiesque (talk) 01:13, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Free imperial city, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reichstag (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:14, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Free imperial city, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swabian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your reminder. Actually I was in the process of going back to what I posted yesterday to ckeck, among other things, all those links.--Lubiesque (talk) 11:49, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

September 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Grafen. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to British Empire, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Grafen (talk) 18:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Prince-Bishopric of Freising, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- Eclipsed (talk) (COI) 14:54, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wettenhausen Abbey may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:29, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Lubiesque, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Victoria Day does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:08, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

RE: "VANDALISM" (!)[edit]

Ever heard of your "assume good faith"? I did not mean to vandalize anything. It was a mistake. Just for your information, next time perhaps you'll think two times about using certain words improperly.

My regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.18.153.36 (talk) 19:52, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at British Raj shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
As I've said repeatedly, the article is about a political entity, not about a term; it doesn't matter that it has been in place for three months. I've been working on this article for 7 years; we've been through this issue many times before, see the talk archives. I know what the article is about. Thank you. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 13:44, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Ottoman Empire[edit]

Your continuous removal of a section link in Ottoman Empire (diff, diff, diff and diff) has been your only "contribution" to the article so far and is starting to resemble vandalism. The article Decline of the Ottoman Empire exists, no matter how you feel about it, and is linked to the main article as laid down in WP:SS which is a Wikipedia guideline. This silly affair has been going for almost a month now, so I hope you will decide to follow the guideline and stop reverting. Regards, eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:21, 5 October 2013 (UTC)


Weihaiwei[edit]

Hello I'm interested in improving the Weihaiwei article, I am reading the "Weihaiwei under British rule" and I also have the "Lion and Dragon in Northern China."Chuangzu (talk) 12:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

MOS:IMAGES[edit]

I have opened a formal RfC at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images#Request for comment on the deprecation of left-aligned images under sub-headings,an issue on which you commented in previous discussion there. DrKiernan (talk) 09:53, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Email[edit]

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, Lubiesque. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Troctar (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello[edit]

I answered you on History of Baden-Württemberg, maybe we can get something good out of this. Ruddah (talk) 14:34, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Removed map[edit]

When I saw that you had removed a map from German mediatization, with the explanation "A more detailed map of the prince-bishoprics is already shown", I was concerned. The map you removed is different from the one of prince-bishoprics in several ways. However, I checked the most conspicuous difference, and found that the removed map shows the prince-bishopric of Magdeburg, which was secularised in 1680. So you did a good job in removing an inappropriate map,

Cheers, Maproom (talk) 08:57, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Duplicate articles[edit]

I noticed that you raised the issue of having two articles Gregorian calendar and Adoption of the Gregorian calendar. FYI please see Talk:Old Style and New Style dates#Duplicate articles -- PBS (talk) 09:37, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Socotra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mocha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

July 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm RA0808. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Qatar seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RA0808 talkcontribs 14:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Lubiesque. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)