Talk:Panzerfaust 3

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Panzerfaust 3 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / European / German

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fire salamander

I dont think the "fire salamander" is a real weapons system, I cant find any other reference to it online or in any databases, not even fictional references Shouldnt it be removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.156.19.49 (talk) 16:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

nevermind it's real 96.255.30.162 (talk) 02:24, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

A Panzerfaust is not a rocket launcher! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.73.123.201 (talk) 23:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amatol isn't used on warhead

Amatol is a cheap, but far from the best, as an explosive.Beyond doubt, the warhead uses Octol a mix of TNT and HMX.The article must be edicted.Agre22 (talk) 00:01, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Agre22[reply]

PzF-3 (DM12 and DM12A1 warheads) used Octol 7030. The newer tandem warheads (DM22, PzF-3T/-3IT) use shaped charges made of PBX octogene (ca. 95% β-HMX). --78.43.69.80 (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IP, thanks for the valuable input, highly appreciated. I don't know much about the chemical compositions of the warheads, though I take your word on it. Feel free to make your own additions. TeckHawk (talk) 13:00, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Panzerfaust 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:56, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Austria does not use the Panzerfaust 3

I tried to look up the source and finding information on the use of the Panzerfaust 3 in the Austrian Bundesheer, but the only official documents I could find were a discussion in the troop-newspaper Truppendienst from 1994 were it was discussed, that Austria needs something to fill the gap in medium-range anti-tank weaponry and the Panzerfaust 3 was one of the discussed candidates. But I could not find anything, wether from articles and publications, nor from personal experience that suggests the use of the Panzerfaust 3 in the Austrian Armed Forces. As I cannot find the source ( Jones, Richard D. Jane's Infantry Weapons 2009/2010. Jane's Information Group; 35 edition (January 27, 2009). ISBN 978-0-7106-2869-5) anywhere, I have to assume that this is a mistake or the source is wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SovietskyAleks (talk • contribs) 08:05, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Armor penetration behind ERA?

The article currently states: "Ability upgrade adds more recent 3-IT grenade which penetrates 900 mm (35 in) armor (equals 750 mm (30 in) vs armor behind ERA)." There's a source linked for the 900 mm penetration but nothing about 750 mm behind ERA. Where does this info come from? If no source can be supplied, it should be removed.--MiBerG (talk) 19:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]