Talk:Papias (lexicographer)

A fact from Papias (lexicographer) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 March 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Papias the Lombard wrote "the first fully recognizable dictionary" in the 1040s?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/March.

Wikipedia

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

Rating and its mysteries

Elementarium doctrinae indeed. I almost didn't post this - but let's assume I'm genuinely curious: on what grounds does a well researched, thoroughly cited and elegantly written article receive a C rating? Haploidavey (talk) 21:39, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly on the basis of possible incompleteness and/or perhaps fewer reference sources cited than would be optimal. John Carter (talk) 21:52, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]