Jump to content

Talk:Parth Samthaan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Multiple Issues

[edit]

Needs extensive copy editing, the article has several grammatical errors/odd phrases. Before that, however, it's in need of several more in-line citations and removal of opinion statements, especially in the lead. The lead should also be made smaller and the excess information added to sections within the article. Omnitaus (talk) 16:39, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Approaches for roles

[edit]

I don't think approaches for roles should be added. User:Rishika.dhanawade

ok I will delete thatKy2-manik (talk) 05:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 June 2016

[edit]


LifeCycle11 (talk) 16:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Sir Joseph (talk) 16:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 June 2016

[edit]


I just like to change grammer and sentence framework at places.

Thanks LifeCycle11 (talk) 20:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Cannolis (talk) 21:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality disputed

[edit]

Poorly written like a fan article. "has garnered him huge popularity and fan following on social media", "inauguration of the film was held on his 25th birthday, 11 March 2016 at Juhu Hotel with open invitation to everyone". The article seems to be written by a gushing fan. All the controversy and recent molestation case FIR seems to be promptly removed in favor of more and more praising.JayB91 (talk) 03:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What else can be added

[edit]

I think this page should also contains Parth's music videos . Itzshweta (talk) 20:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Detail

[edit]

1, 2,2,3,4,

please add it in depth. 

2405:204:A09F:52B9:B017:BBD2:FAD0:A0C0 (talk) 16:27, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At this point, it's probably WP:UNDUE to mention. WP:BLPCRIME applies to an extent, although Samthaan probably falls into the public figure to an extent. Unless there's widespread reporting from high-quality sources about this, it probably shouldn't be in the article at this point in time. That can change as the matter develops. Ravensfire (talk) 16:53, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User:Ravensfire there are enough reliable sources.
1,2,3,4 and 5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4063:4E1B:9A67:C6C9:EFC2:6404:196 (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User:Ravensfire Wiki clearly states that "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous." WP:UNDUE the individual himself clarified that this was impugning his sexuality. WP:BLPCRIME he is not convicted of the allegation.
https://www.filmibeat.com/television/news/2020/when-parth-samthaan-revealed-that-he-is-straight-hoping-to-find-a-girlfriend-296929.html
https://www.bollywoodlife.com/news-gossip/parth-samthaan-i-am-straight-and-hoping-to-find-a-girlfriend-soon-649321/
https://www.india.com/entertainment/parth-samthaan-on-molestation-case-the-victim-has-manipulated-her-age-but-truth-will-soon-prevail-2070771/
https://www.indiatoday.in/television/story/parth-samthaan-molestation-case-967672-2017-03-25 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ester8888 (talkcontribs) 17:25, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, managed to mis-read the sources thinking they were about what Samthaan said, that's on my. It's more complicated. The sources are NOT from this person, but from someone else. While some of the sources mentioned are reliable (fimilibeat is not considered very reliable, too gossipy, see WP:ICTFFAQ, but india.com and indiatoday.com are good), they're all basically repeated what was said by the other person via Instagram. That's getting into self-published territory. Wikipedia has a very strict policy about NOT using self-published sources to make claims about another person. The sources here are basically repeating exactly what was from the instagram post without anything substantial added. WP:BLPSELFPUB says to avoid that. Also, in general, statements about sexuality are strongly preferred to be by the article subject, not by a third party. It's more innuendo at that point when it comes from a third party. It's not libel or slander - but it's not something that really belongs in Wikipedia. I think I'm going to raise this up on BLPN for outside advice on this. Ravensfire (talk) 18:45, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[[Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Parth_Samthaan|BLPN section created about this. Ravensfire (talk) 20:14, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy - Contentious Libel needs to be removed

[edit]

This profile continues to be vandalized when Wiki clearly notes in relation to BLP that "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ester8888 (talkcontribs) 16:57, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1 this is not a poor source ok. You are just supporting a Molestor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4063:4212:1EE5:9FDD:D8CC:EB60:D78B (talk) 17:10, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay folks, let's calm down here. Please don't comment about the editor, but on their edits and backing your comments by good sources. Always assume they are acting in good faith, and realize that editing disputes happen all the time. Please, no comments about supporting/not supporting, vandalizing, libel/slander. Discuss the material, with good sources and based on Wikipedia policies. Ravensfire (talk) 19:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, please remember to SIGN your posts, by adding four tildes ~~~~ at the end, or clicking on the sign button on the editor (usually looks like an x followed by a cursive line. It makes it much easier to identify who's said what. Ravensfire (talk) 19:08, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There was a relationships section that was in violation of BLP that I have removed. It is another flavor of tabloid journalism/insinuations being added in vandalizing the profile. Ester8888 (talk) 01:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Ester8888[reply]

Music Videos

[edit]

Parth Samthaan has performed in various music videos. Starting from "Ghazab Kiya Hai" by Udaas Pankaj in 2012 to the most recent one named "Pehle Pyaar Ka Pehla Gham" in 2021. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.185.134.71 (talk) 05:39, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 August 2021

[edit]
95.10.22.155 (talk) 23:11, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ayca

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:41, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 September 2021

[edit]
R.M.Mishyala Rashmi (talk) 10:14, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want edit this page.

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. (pinging R.M.Mishyala Rashmi) — LauritzT (talk) 10:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Height

[edit]

Update Parth Samthaan's Height. The parameter should be 1.86m Shrey ps13 (talk) 20:24, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:V is policy. What's your cite? DMacks (talk) 21:21, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 February 2022

[edit]

2021 SVMTMusic (talk) 11:28, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:04, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 June 2022

[edit]

Soldierofcongress (talk) 07:19, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: No point in adding that until the other article exists. Cannolis (talk) 07:37, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]