Talk:Peking Plan
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Peking Plan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Peking Plan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 April 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Why was it called the Peking plan? 138.237.165.140 14:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- I'd assume that as with most other military operation, codenames are chosen more or less at random.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:21, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- Depends on who's doing the naming. The Americans seem to put a lot of thought into the names of their operations. The Iraq Invasion was called Cobra II, as a homage to Cobra, the Normandy operation. Krupo 04:13, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Hydroplanes???
[edit]Anyone aware of the reference that says the German Navy had Hyrdoplanes? I suspect it's a translation error and they mean Sea-Planes Ralph 10 April06
- My mistake, tnx for pointing it out. Fixed.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:48, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Ranks
[edit]All translation of Polish ranks are wrong. There is no such rank as Sublietenant Commander, or Counter Admiral! We have appropriate rank translations - just ask the Polish Navy. Kontradmirał to Rear Admiral. The word "counter" means - especially for Americans - the top, like Polish words "kantor" or "blat". The translation of ranks is as wrong as "thank you from the mountain". belissarius 03:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- The word counter admiral is used (per the article). That said, the article needs a copyedit, certainly.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 15:19, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
[edit]Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 20:13, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Why Wicher and Gryf were not included?
[edit]Why were those ships left out "for certain destruction"? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 18:57, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Self-reply: an answer is given at Talk:ORP_Gryf_(1936), but more could be said, I am sure. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 01:00, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
B-class review
[edit]This article is currently at start/C class, but could be improved to B-class if it had more (inline) citations. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 01:00, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- C-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class Polish military history articles
- Polish military history task force articles
- C-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- C-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- C-Class Poland articles
- Mid-importance Poland articles
- WikiProject Poland articles