Pennsylvania Railroad 4876 was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
There were some very minor punctuation and other language issues, but I have fixed them. Aside from those, the article is well written and complies to WP:MOS requirements.
Pictures are properly tagged and has a suitable caption.
Overall: This is a short but concise article on the subject, well researched and written. I am confident that it meets all the requirements for a GA, and am happy to pass it. Well done. – SMasters (talk) 16:31, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In the article titled 'Of GG1's, NJ Transit, Boeing 707's, and the media', author Don Wood said she was slated for the Smithsonian (Ultimately, of course, the 4876 ultimately never made it theren). This appeared on page 66 in the August 1984 issue of Trains Magazine, published by Kalmbach Publishing. Not sure how the whole Wikipedia reference thing works with the appropriate codes and such, so hopefully someone will toss in the appropriate reference for me since it's an interesting facet of her history that she nearly made it to the most important museum in this country (As did an example of the Alco PA, which also didn't quite make it there). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.79.6.240 (talk) 05:26, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Result: Delist. Seven days have passed with no fixes or interest expressed.IazygesConsermonorOpus meum 06:51, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
2011 GA, with a drive-by pass for a review. Two citation needed tags for large portions of paragraphs lacking citations, and an additional paragraph also lacking sourcing. I've identified two more recent news articles that discuss the locomotive in detail which are not cited and should be considered [1][2]. Overall, I think this article is salvageable, but it does need some work. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 03:18, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
b (citations to reliable sources): 