Talk:Petaluma River

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Initial assessment

Clearly a stub on an important topic. River has high value ecological components and importance for navigability and history of the north bay. Anlace 23:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Length

How long is the Petaluma River ??? --84.138.102.85 13:04, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Really a creek but an interesting one at that!

At a time when money was available to dredge and maintain rivers, this creek was glorified to obtain funding. The history of movement of food items, including game from the rich lands of Sonoma County through this port to SF is of considerable importance to early SF Bay Area development. Both matters deserve attention... Norcalal (talk) 08:21, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Back

Hi, I'm writing an article about the Petaluma River on the Dutch Wikipedia based on this one. But I am doubting about how to translate the word 'back' (History), is it back like the backside or like back in time? If someone could help me, I would be very grateful. Thanks already. Ikkenickdanniet (talk) 10:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]