Talk:Peter Mathiesen

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 9 February 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 01:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Mathiesen (clockmaker) → Peter Mathiesen – There is only one actual "Peter Mathiesen" in Wikipedia; the redirect to Peter Matthiessen is from a misspelling, which I would suggest should not be deemed primary over the correct spelling of another person's actual name. BD2412 T 02:21, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. Such name differences are handled via hatnotes, not through parenthetical qualifiers attached to unique names. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 05:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:20, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. When this new article was created this past August, it could and should have been written right over the old redirect from 2007. Station1 (talk) 09:44, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.