Jump to content

Talk:Peter Nijkamp

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled]

[edit]

Why is the opinion of Mr. Arnold Heertje included? He is not involved and he has an opinion about everything. I think his opinion does not carry enough weight to be included. Andries (talk) 07:32, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Controversy

[edit]

It's true, it happened, it's all over the papers in The Netherlands. Quite serious scientists and media support the allegations, some even speaking of "factfree science". But that does not mean it should be in Wikipedia - to this extent. It unbalances the article and the reflist. It should be worded with more caution and restraint. Regards, Sander1453 (talk) 13:50, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree that the section on allegiations unbalances the article, I don't believe the section should be reworded. Instead, the allegiations might be balanced by a section on Nijkamps contributions to economics. Currently, the article mirrors the not uncommon belief that Nijkamp values quantity of quality. In half a year, no one has found the need to rebalance this article, which suggests there is no dispute at all. Eezacque (talk) 13:11, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With templates lying around for (sometimes) years on this wiki, 6 months of no editing proves nothing. Sander1453 (talk) 13:19, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed some text and the template with it. It will have to do in this version. Sander1453 (talk) 08:18, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Peter Nijkamp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]