Talk:Peter Rabbit (TV series)

Animation: American / Television / Computer Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group.
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Television: Nickelodeon Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Nickelodeon task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Broken link removed

I removed the following link, which was in the "References" section. It seems to be an attempt to include a file from somebody's own PC. Gronk Oz (talk) 10:08, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Munley, John Patrick, May 15, 2014 PETER RABBIT Review. <peter rabbit review. [file://localhost/Users/jackpatrickmunley/Desktop/PETER%20RABBIT%20review.pdf] Retrieved May 15, 2014

Shoes

Why do we care about this: Unlike the character from the books, this Peter Rabbit lacks shoes. What's the relevance of this asute observation, and how does it help us understand the TV series better?

Additionally, in this edit I removed "The title character" from Peter's description, because it's pointless. We can tell who the title character because it's written in huge letters at the top of the page, and presumably we've already read the lead and the synopsis. I don't see the value of this and it strikes me as amateurish grade school writing, not writing fit for a global encyclopedia. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Why do we care about this: Unlike the character from the books, this Peter Rabbit lacks shoes. What's the relevance of this asute observation, and how does it help us understand the TV series better?": It does show how this incarnation of the character is different from the original.

"Additionally, in this edit I removed "The title character" from Peter's description, because it's pointless. We can tell who the title character because it's written in huge letters at the top of the page, and presumably we've already read the lead and the synopsis. I don't see the value of this and it strikes me as amateurish grade school writing, not writing fit for a global encyclopedia.": I will agree with that point.

Lucifer Morningstar 01 (talk) 07:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The superficial difference of shoes is not noteworthy unless it comes with critical analysis, or some explanation of significance from reliable published sources, i.e. "Series creator Jane Doe opted to depict Peter without shoes to 'make the character a little more rooted in the wilderness'" or whatever. Willy Wonka had a goatee in the Dahl books, but not in the films, and nobody thought to mention that at Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory, or Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (film). This sort of detail is cruftbait. Additionally, I removed "eponymous protagonist" as "eponymous" is still unnecessary, and "protagonist" contravenes WP:PROTAGONIST. We don't need interpretive labels. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Character order

Why do you have preference for that order of the characters?

Lucifer Morningstar 01 (talk) 00:56, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Tod is most definitely a bigger character than Dr. and Mrs. Bobtail. He's in almost every episode and by far the most present character after the three young rabbits. Mark Huckerby also gets 4th credit in Season 2. Dr. and Mrs. Bobtail appear very sporadically through the show: the only Season 1 episode where she is largely featured is 'The Tale of the Big Move'. Apart from that, she has two (nearly silent) appearances in "Peter Rabbit's Christmas Tale" and "The Tale of Jeremy Fisher's Recital" along with a voice over line in "The Tale of Jemima's Egg". Dr. Bobtail has only a couple appearances more. If the characters were divided in two different sections for heroes and villains, this wouldn't be a problem, but having the Bobtails as main characters and Mr. Tod as a 'recurring' one is actually misleading about their respective importance and presence in the show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.44.93.220 (talk) 13:38, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Peter Rabbit (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:01, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]