Talk:Phantom's Revenge

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Phantom's Revenge article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Phantom's Revenge has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 7, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

Amusement Parks: Roller Coasters Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Roller Coasters task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Clean-up finished. Rpachico 15:57, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Phantom's Revenge/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 03:04, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Might as well do this one too while we're at it as the last remaining 2012 recreation nom. Comments to come soon. Wizardman 03:04, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will do this tonight, almost forgot about it. Wizardman 14:56, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the issues I found:

"When opened in 1991" When it opened
"After the 2000," Not sure what this is trying to say exactly.
"of Mitch Hawker s " Hawker's?
"Due to the modifications, both Morgan and Arrow track are used on the coaster." could this be better explained? I see Morgan and Arrow are mentioned later on, perhaps move a bit of that to here.
" with 2 trains." and " opened with 4 inversions" with two trains and with four inversions. Generally single-digit numbers are written out.
"Before the renovation, the length was 3,000 feet (910 m), the lift remained unchanged." and the lift

I'll put the article on hold and will pass it when fixed. Wizardman 03:39, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have addressed all your comments.-- Astros4477 (Talk) 14:41, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Everything checks out now, so I'll pass the article. Wizardman 02:43, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Drop length

Meiko3195, you're being summoned to this page to discuss these edits you keep trying to ram into the article. Please don't do that. More than one editor has asked you to discuss this, and if you keep attempting to insert it, you may be blocked for edit warring. Please locate a reliable source per our verifiability policy, and discuss the source here. We should avoid disrupting the article until an agreement can be reached here. Personal experiences do not count and are considered original research. Please keep this in mind. --GoneIn60 (talk) 23:05, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]