Talk:Pink ribbon

Medicine: Hematology-oncology / Pathology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hematology-oncology task force.
	This article is supported by the Pathology task force.

Women's Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled

Please remember that this page is NOT FOR PROMOTIONAL PURPOSES.

Do not use this page to tell readers to support your favorite event or cause, no matter how important the cause is to you. Cause-related "soapboxes" will be deleted. WhatamIdoing 20:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In

In the article says: "Breast Cancer is a very personal disease as the breasts are a strong part of femininity and what makes a woman a woman."

It may be offensive for women who had lost a breast... please reconsider using this sentence.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.116.152.228 (talk) 18:49, 1 December 2006‎

Article has been modified as requested, tag removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.127.126.101 (talk) 12:50, 15 January 2007‎

"Breast cancer awareness month"

Would it be possible to explicitly indicate when Breast Cancer Awareness Month occurs (that is, is it in April, June, etc.?)? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.112.154.119 (talk) 18:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

What is up with the trademarked pink ribbon international logo??

Seeing as this article is about the generic pink ribbon for awareness of breast cancer - the plain pink ribbon image should be displayed as it was before. Turning this page into an ad for a commercial company that "focuses itself on intellectual property holding, licencing and administration for and on behalf of the Group as well as for third parties" is very poor taste.

Make your ad under a more appropriate pinkribbon.com, and quite disrespecting all that the pink ribbon has come to represent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.86.59 (talk) 03:22, 24 July 2007‎

And again: This page is NOT for promoting a single organization. Dozens of groups use some form of a pink ribbon. Pink Ribbon International does NOT deserve to have their logo at the top of this page, as if it were all about them. WhatamIdoing 19:51, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Teardrop Pink Ribbon

I pulled this text:

The Breast Cancer Action Ottawa ribbon has a unique meaning. The image, being the teardrop shape, represents the tears shed at the time of diagnosis, the pink represents the women who are living with the disease, and the black is in honour of those who have died. The Challenge is to end the deaths so that we can remove the black lining and wear the pink ribbon in celebration.

About the tear drop pink ribbon

firstly on the grounds that it's word-for-word off their copyrighted website, and secondly on the grounds that the marketing campaign for a local group is not sufficiently notable to merit inclusion in an encyclopedia entry on the broader topic. If you want to restore it, I suggest first re-writing it to meet Wiki guidelines and then putting it on a page about Breast Cancer Action Ottawa in a subsection titled -- Marketing Themes --. WhatamIdoing 18:12, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Breast Cancer Awareness Month, v2

I propose that all of the stuff about Breast Cancer Awareness Month which is NOT specifically related to pink ribbons be moved to the BCAM page. I think this change will greatly improve both articles. Any comments or objections? WhatamIdoing 18:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Link to it, by all means- but this page is about pink ribbons, not breast cancer. Titanium geek (talk) 06:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yellow Ribbon Song

I've removed the confusing "history of coloured ribbons" paragraphs from this article- it's about Pink Ribbons, not every coloured kind of ribbon.

Titanium geek (talk) 06:51, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I apologize for reverting it as vandalism. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:01, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Shawn- the wikipedia community isn't as scary as I thought. :) Titanium geek (talk) 07:07, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Not all! We just get sleepy sometimes. And on that note, off to bed for me.... Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:24, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the deleted information to Awareness ribbon, where it presumably belongs. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:06, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sexism

Under the criticisms section, no mention is made of the whole "Pink is for girls" thing and Breast cancer predominantly affecting women - has no one ever objected to this as sexist and a little infantile ? - 124.191.144.183 (talk) 10:39, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What specific criticism do you mean? As you point out, breast cancer does predominantly affect women...

In modern times, Pink#In gender is indeed usually associated with the female gender. That seems to make it a fairly logical color choice, for an Awareness ribbon campaign.

I'm not sure how that could be seen as sexist (or infantile)? If you have details, or ideally some sources/citations that formally assert this criticism, that might help. Thanks. –Quiddity (talk) 21:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's sexist if you're a man with breast cancer. Imagine how alienating that girly-pink world must be for them. Pink also associated with a particular view of femininity, the view of females as frilly, decorative objects (e.g., Pink dress of Marilyn Monroe)—perhaps desirable, but not independent and powerful. It's infantilizing because pink is the color of choice for little girls, not for women in their 60s and 70s.

Much of this is described at Breast cancer awareness, and could be imported here. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that makes sense. (Coffee/wakefulness also helps.) I've not visited that topic in a while, so will leave it to you two to select material worth importing. –Quiddity (talk) 23:11, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Pink ribbon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:08, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pink ribbon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121222012045/http://www.wima.org.nz/pages/Pink_Ribbon.php to http://www.wima.org.nz/pages/Pink_Ribbon.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]