Talk:Please Miss

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Gender studies

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Please Miss appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 February 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Grace Lavery's autobiography Please Miss discusses her transition but also the "paradigmatic concept of the penis"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Please Miss.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 10:56, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Grace Lavery's autobiography Please Miss discusses her transition but also the "paradigmatic concept of the penis"? Source: Please Miss, Publishers Weekly
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Talim (textiles)
- Comment: The article was moved from draftspace to mainspace with this edit.

Created by Silver seren (talk). Self-nominated at 18:43, 21 January 2023 (UTC).[reply]

@Silver seren: New enough in mainspace and long enough. QPQ present. Earwig mostly catches quotes and the work title itself. The quote in the hook fact needs to be more clearly attributed to Publishers Weekly in the article and then I will approve. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:31, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what you mean by more clearly, Sammi Brie? The quote is from the second sentence in the lede, which also has an in-line citation to the Publishers Weekly reference. Silver seren^C 23:33, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Silver seren: The article needs to state inline that the "paradigmatic concept of the penis" wording came from the magazine review. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's in quotation marks in the article. Doesn't that inherently imply it's from the connected reference, as are any quotes used in the article? Silver seren^C 23:42, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Sammi Brie, I've added a specific name reference in that sentence to the source of the quote. Silver seren^C 00:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just being picky because it's been an issue with a few hooks of late. Approved. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:11, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]