Talk:Pokiri/Archive 1

Fair use rationale for Image:Pokiri movieposter.jpg

Image:Pokiri movieposter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bias/Neutrality in Box Office Collections section

Of late, the box office section of this article has undergone multiple revisions - mostly with conflicting opinions about the performance of the movie under consideration. From the pattern of edits, it is clear that there are two groups of people trying to put across their POV - instead of an objective appraisal of the box office performance. Most Indian movies have no clear data on the money earned by them. I am moving this section to the bias category - until this dispute is resolved. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.16.17.152 (talk) 05:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pokiri collections

I want to change full length gross in india to 66.5 crores from 40 crores as per the following link

http://www.cinegoer.com/pokirirecords.htm

If anybody have objection please post a message

Raghusri (talk) Raghusri 15:46, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that's a reliable source, for such a sensitive issue like box office gross. If you have something of high quality, like a newspaper or news channel, we could use that. Secret of success (talk) 15:48, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Page Move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. The dab page will be usurped and hat notes added. Cúchullain ^t/c 00:39, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pokiri (2006 film) → Pokiri – is an unnecessary disambiguation page that lists two pages Pokiri (2006 film) and PokKiri, which are two different titles in all aspects. Hence the disambiguation page is not necessary and the page Pokiri (2006 film) should be moved to Pokiri. Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 21:06, 2 August 2014 (UTC) DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 16:23, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - what are you saying here, that the Telugu word "Rogue" (పోకిరి) has one "k" and the Tamil word "Rogue" (போக்கிரி) has "kk"? There's still enormous potential for confusion here, and neither word has a primary topic. The base terms Pokiri Pokkiri Pokkiri Raja should all head to one dab page. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:17, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:UNDAB. This is the only use of this term. The others listed on the dab page are mostly different spellings (two ks); one is a WP:PTM. Any "enormous" confusion can be quickly rectified with a hatnote. --В²C ☎ 00:06, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.