Talk:Polanyi's paradox

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 16 October 2018 by reviewer Legacypac (talk · contribs).

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computer science Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Polanyi's paradox received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Hello,

My name is Handslv. I would like you to review my article on Polanyi's paradox because I want to expand my discussion further. Could you please give me some suggestions? Thanks!

--Handslv (talk) 10:23, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

URL issue[edit]

The URL for this page contains a Unicode smart quote: Polanyi%E2%80%99s_paradox

The page should be renamed to include an ASCII single quote, and the old URL should redirect to the new one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:CA00:12C:85DE:0:0:860:27F1 (talk) 13:38, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism may have mistaken focus?[edit]

Was Polanyi explicitly trying to solve an AI problem? Or was he trying to describe a characteristic of human knowledge? The bulk of the "Criticism" section here appears to me to be missing the point entirely. The assertion that Polanyi's paradox can be circumvented for the purposes of AI research does not seem to be a valid argument against his point at all, rather, it assumes he was correct, and then approaches the research project differently. Perhaps most of the current "Criticism" section should be moved, either to a separate section outside of Criticism titled something like "Implications for AI", or out of this article altogether and into an AI article. TooManyFingers (talk) 19:51, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To me, the AI discussion just seems completely out of place in this article, because even though AI research makes use of his idea, AI research has nothing to contribute toward forming or changing that idea. It's almost as if the article on Newton's laws contained a long chapter on golf. Yes, golf includes motion, but... :) TooManyFingers (talk) 00:02, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]