Talk:Porter hypothesis
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Renamed. Timrollpickering (talk) 23:07, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Porter Hypothesis → Porter hypothesis – Please put your reason for moving here. Tony (talk) 08:50, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, so the article title should be downcased. In particular, en.WP doesn't cap laws, rules, theories, or hypotheses. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 08:50, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
- Support per nom. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 14:06, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Support. For the above-mentioned reasons. Lientinge (talk) 06:32, 4 June 2013 (UTC).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories:
- Stub-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Stub-Class Economics articles
- Low-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- Stub-Class Environment articles
- Low-importance Environment articles
- Stub-Class Invention articles
- Low-importance Invention articles
- WikiProject Invention articles