Talk:Primitive Technology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 14 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Huw82.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The channel has a new logo on it, as can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAL3JXZSzSm8AlZyD3nQdBA Perhaps it's time to change the logo on the article to reflect this change? Jurryaany (talk) 16:46, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jurryaany: You can upload a new version of File:Primitive Technology logo.png, or a new file, if you wish. Hrodvarsson (talk) 00:38, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Hrodvarsson: Alright I'll do that then. I assume the same copyright status would apply? Jurryaany (talk) 13:37, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jurryaany: I am not an expert on copyright but I think so, unless otherwise stated by the creator. I have edited the non-free use rationale to be logo specific, which I imagine the original uploader intended but may have been unaware that such a template existed. Hrodvarsson (talk) 20:32, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Trivialist: Can you explain why you reverted the edits to the file? You did not leave an edit summary. Hrodvarsson (talk) 23:41, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I reverted it because it seemed like it should be uploaded as a new file, not overwriting an existing file. Trivialist (talk) 00:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Trivialist: I do not think there would be a benefit in having both the wordpress.com logo and the new logo in the article so the previous image would be deleted as non-free. Do you mind if I revert your reversion? The new logo appears to be the subject's current branding. Hrodvarsson (talk) 00:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine; since they're both non-free images the old version would have been deleted anyway. Trivialist (talk) 01:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks. I have done so. Hrodvarsson (talk) 01:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Does a youtuber warrant a Wikipedia page?[edit]

Is he famous? Not a celebrity, not a historical figure. I don't understand why this YouTube channel has a page. 73.109.165.7 (talk) 03:06, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The subject meets our Notability requirements as it has received significant coverage by Reliable Sources. --DanielRigal (talk) 03:16, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]