Talk:Provisions of Westminster
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Temporary redirect
[edit]Provisions of Westminster will presumably have its own article one day (albeit that it is a bit of a footnote in UK Parliamentary history), but for now I have inserted a redirect to the Provisions of Oxford (that article talks about the Provisions of Westminster (which only lasted 3 years anyhow) and the Provisions of Oxford superseded them. Legis 10:27, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, have replaced it with a stubby summary of the provisions and their background. Legis 13:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Paul Brand quote
[edit]Does anybody have the direct quote from Kings, Barons and Justices that is used to make the statement at the end of the article? I cannot find that book in a single library, and it is perfect for a project I am doing. Thanks for your help —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sedi911 (talk • contribs) 00:38, 23 March 2007 (UTC).
Categories:
- Start-Class Middle Ages articles
- Mid-importance Middle Ages articles
- Start-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- Start-Class law articles
- Mid-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class England-related articles
- Mid-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- Wikipedia articles that use British English